تحلیل تطبیقی کیفی و خط‌مشی عمومی

1. ساعی، علی؛ افشار کبیری؛ محمدسالار کسرایی و حسین صادقی (1390)، «سرمایه اجتماعی و حکمرانی خوب: تحلیل تطبیقی فازی بین کشوری از سال 2000 تا 2008»، مسائل اجتماعی ایران (دانشگاه خوارزمی)، 2 (2)، ص63−94.

2. عباسی تقی دیزج، رسول (1398)، «تحلیل تطبیقی−کیفی عوامل مؤثر بر تولید علم در سطح کلان»، جامعه‌شناسی کاربردی (مجله پژوهشی علوم انسانی دانشگاه اصفهان)، 1(73)، ص105−122.

3. عباسی تقی دیزج، رسول و مسعود فراستخواه (1393)، «تحلیل فازی عوامل مؤثر بر توازن بین برابری آموزش عالی و توسعه اقتصادی در سطح کلان (یک رویکرد تطبیقی−کمی)»، پژوهش‌های جامعه‌شناسی معاصر، 3(5)، ص25−50.

4. عباسی، رسول و رضا همتی (1392). «تحلیل تطبیقی−کیفی تضاد سیاسی خشونت آمیز در سطح کلان»، فصلنامه جامعه‌شناسی کاربردی، 24(2)، ص 89−110.

5. Bandelow, N. C., Vogeler, C. S., Hornung, J., Kuhlmann, J., & Heidrich, S. (2019), “Learning as a Necessary but Not Sufficient Condition for Major Health Policy Change: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Combining ACF and MSF”, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1393920

6. Basurto, X., & Speer, J. (2010), “Structuring the Calibration of Qualitative Data as Sets for Qualitative Comparative Analysis ( QCA ) ”, https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1831606

7. Berg-Schlosser, D., & De Meur, G. (2009), “Comparative research design: case and variable selection. In Beno Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.)”, Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (pp. 19–32). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569

8. Berg-Schlosser, D., De Meur, G., Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. C. (2009), “Qualitative comparative analysis (qca) as an approach. In Benoît Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.)”, Applied Social Research Methods: Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (pp. 1–18). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569 NV - 51

9. Capano, G., Pritoni, A., & Vicentini, G. (n.d.), “Do policy instruments matter? Governments’ choice of policy mix and higher education performance in Western Europe”, Journal of Public Policy, 1–27. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X19000047

10. Caren, N., & Panofsky, A. (2005), “A Technique for Adding Temporality to Qualitative”, Sociological Methods & Research, 34(2), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124105277197

11. Cooper, B., & Glaesser, J. (2016), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis , Necessary Conditions , and Limited Diversity : Some Problematic Consequences of Schneider and Wagemann ’ s Enhanced Standard Analysis”, Field Methods, 28(3), 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X15598974

12. Cragun, D., Pal, T., Vadaparampil, S. T., Baldwin, J., Hampel, H., & DeBate, R. D. (2016), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Hybrid Method for Identifying Factors Associated with Program Effectiveness”, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(3), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815572023

13. Cronqvist, L., & Berg-Schlosser, D. (2009), “Multi-value qca (mvqca). In Benoît Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.)”, Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (pp. 69–86). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569 NV - 51

14. Davis, A., Javernick-Will, A., & Cook, S. M. (2019), “The use of qualitative comparative analysis to identify pathways to successful and failed sanitation systems”, Science of The Total Environment, 663, 507–517. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.291

15. De Block, D., & Vis, B. (2018), “Addressing the Challenges Related to Transforming Qualitative Into Quantitative Data in Qualitative Comparative Analysis”, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1558689818770061. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818770061

16. De Meur, G., Rihoux, B., & Yamasaki, S. (2009). “Addressing the critiques of qca. In Benoît Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (pp. 147–166). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569 NV - 51

17. Dekker, R., & Scholten, P. (2017), “Framing the Immigration Policy Agenda: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Media Effects on Dutch Immigration Policies”, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216688323

18. Fischer, M., & Maggetti, M. (2017), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis and the Study of Policy Processes”, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 19(4), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2016.1149281

19. Hill, L. G., Cooper, B. R., & Parker, L. A. (2019), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Mixed-Method Tool for Complex Implementation Questions”, The Journal of Primary Prevention, 40(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-019-00536-5

20. Hörisch, F. (2013), “Fiscal Policy in Hard Times: A Fuzzy-Set QCA of Fiscal Policy Reactions to the Financial Crisis”, Zeitschrift Für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 7(2), 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-013-0152-y

21. Ingrams, A. (2017), “The transparency performance puzzle : A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of policy failure in open government initiatives un co rre ct ed pr oo f v si un co rre ct pr oo”, Information Polity, (22), 25–39, https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-160014

22. Jordan, E., Gross, M. E., Javernick-Will, A. N., & Garvin, M. J. (2011), “Use and misuse of qualitative comparative analysis”, Construction Management and Economics, 29(11), 1159–1173, https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.640339

23. Kahwati, L., Jacobs, S., Kane, H., Lewis, M., Viswanathan, M., & Golin, C. E. (2016). “Using qualitative comparative analysis in a systematic review of a complex intervention”, Systematic Reviews, 5, 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0256-y

24. Kane, H., Lewis, M. A., Williams, P. A., & Kahwati, L. C. (2014), “Using qualitative comparative analysis to understand and quantify translation and implementation”, Translational Behavioral Medicine, 4(2), 201–208, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-014-0251-6

25. Kim, Y., & Verweij, S. (2016), “Two effective causal paths that explain the adoption of US state environmental justice policy”, Policy Sciences, 49(4), 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9249-x

26. Kingdon, J. W. (1984), Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, Boston: Little Brown.

27. Krook, M. L. (2010), “Women’s Representation in Parliament: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis”, Political Studies, 58(5), 886–908, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00833.x

28. Lee, S. S. (2013a), “Fuzzy-set method in comparative social policy: a critical introduction and review of the applications of the fuzzy-set method”, Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 1905–1922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9633-8

29. Lee, S. S. (2013b), “High non-standard employment rates in the Republic of Korea and Japan: Analyzing policy configurations with fuzzy-set/QCA”, Policy and Society, 32(4), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.10.005

30. Legewie, N. (2013), “An Introduction to Applied Data Analysis with Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) ”, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14(3), Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1961/3594

31. Maggetti, M. (2009), “The role of independent regulatory agencies in policy-making: a comparative analysis”, Journal of European Public Policy, 16(3), 450–470, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802662854

32. Maggetti, M., & Levi-Faur, D. (2013), “Dealing with Errors in QCA”, Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 198–204. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23563603

33. Marx, A. (2010), “Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA) and model specification: Benchmarks for future csQCA applications”, International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(2), 138–158, https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2010.4.2.138

34. Mello, P. A. (2013), “From Prospect to Practice : A Critical Review of Applications in Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis”, In 8th Pan-European Conference on International Relations. Warsaw, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2349513

35. Mill, J. S. (Ed.). (2011), “Of the Four Methods of Experimental Inquiry”, In A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence, and the Methods of Scientific Investigation (Vol. 1, pp. 450–479), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139149839.024

36. Pogrebinschi, T., & Ryan, M. (2018), “Moving beyond input legitimacy: When do democratic innovations affect policy making? ”, European Journal of Political Research, 57(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12219

37. Primc, K., Slabe-Erker, R., & Majcen, B. (2019), “Constructing energy poverty profiles for an effective energy policy”, Energy Policy, 128, 727–734. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.059

38. Pritoni, A. (2018), “Public Agendas and Policy Agendas in Three Western European Countries: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis”, Government and Opposition, 1–22. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/gov.2018.28

39. Ragin, C. C. (1987), “The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies”, University of California Press, Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pnx57

40. Ragin, C. C. (1994), “Introduction to qualitative comparative analysis”, In A. M. Hicks & T. Janoski (Eds.), The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State (pp. 299–319). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139174053.013

41. Ragin, C. C. (2008a), “Measurement Versus Calibration: A Set‐Theoretic Approach”, In J. M. Box-Steffensmeier, H. E. Brady, D. Collier, & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology (pp. 174–198). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0008

42. Ragin, C. C. (2008b), Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

43. Ragin, C. C. (2009), “Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsqca) ”, In Benoît Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (pp. 87–122). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569 NV - 51

44. Ragin, C. C., & Rubinson, C. (2009), “The distinctiveness of comparative research”, In T. L. & N. Robinson (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Comparative Politics (pp. 12–34). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857021083.n2

45. Ragin, C. C., & Sonnett, J. (2005), “Between Complexity and Parsimony: Limited Diversity, Counterfactual Cases, and Comparative Analysis BT - Vergleichen in der Politikwissenschaft”, In S. Kropp & M. Minkenberg (Eds.) (pp. 180–197). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80441-9_9

46. Ragin, C. C., Patros, T., Strand, S. I., & Rubinson, C. (2017). USER’S GUIDE TO Fuzzy-Set / Qualitative Comparative Analysis. California, Irvine.

47. Rihoux, Benoît, & De Meur, G. (2009), “Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csqca) ”, In Benoît Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (pp. 33–68). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569 NV - 51

48. Rihoux, Benoît, & Grimm, H. (2006), “Introduction. In Benoît Rihoux & H. Grimm (Eds.), Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis Beyond the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28829-5

49. Rihoux, Benoît, Álamos-Concha, P., Bol, D., Marx, A., & Rezsöhazy, I. (2013), “From Niche to Mainstream Method? A Comprehensive Mapping of QCA Applications”, in Journal Articles from 1984 to 2011. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 175–184. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23563600

50. Rihoux, Benoît, Rezsöhazy, I., & Bol, D. (2011), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) in Public Policy Analysis: an Extensive Review”, German Policy Studies, 7(3), 9–82.

51. Rihoux, Benoît. (2008), “Case‐Oriented Configura‐Tional Research: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (Qca), Fuzzy Sets, and Related Techniques”, In J. M. Box-Steffensmeier, H. E. Brady, D. Collier, & B. Rihoux (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology (pp. 722–736). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0031

52. Roig-Tierno, N., Gonzalez-Cruz, T. F., & Llopis-Martinez, J. (2017), “An overview of qualitative comparative analysis: A bibliometric analysis”, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.12.002

53. Sabatier, P. A. (1988), “An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein”, Policy Sciences, 21(2/3), 129–168. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4532139

54. Schneider, C. Q. (2019), “Two-step QCA revisited: the necessity of context conditions”, Quality & Quantity, 53(3), 1109–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0805-7

55. Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2006), “Reducing complexity in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Remote and proximate factors and the consolidation of democracy”, European Journal of Political Research, 45(5), 751–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00635.x

56. Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2010), “Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets”, Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 397–418. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729793

57. Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012), “Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Strategies for Social Inquiry”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139004244

58. Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2013), “Doing Justice to Logical Remainders in QCA: Moving Beyond the Standard Analysis”, Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 211–220. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23563605

59. Sehring, J., & Korhonen, K. (2013), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis ( QCA ): An application to compare national Qualitative Comparative Analysis ( QCA ) An application to compare national REDD + policy processes (No. Working Paper 121) ”, Indonesia, Bogor. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/004278

60. Smith, K. B., & Larimer, C. (2017), The Public Policy Theory Primer, New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494352

61. Stokke, O. S. (2004),. “Boolean Analysis, Mechanisms, and the Study of Regime Effectiveness BT - Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies”, In A. Underdal & O. R. Young (Eds.) (pp. 87–119). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2208-1_5

62. Thomann, E. (2019), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis ( QCA ) as a tool for street-level bureaucracy. In P. Hupe (Ed.)”, Research Handbook on Street-Level Bureaucracy (pp. 370–391). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786437631.00035

63. Thomas, J., O’Mara-Eves, A., & Brunton, G. (2014), “Using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in systematic reviews of complex interventions: a worked example”, Systematic Reviews, 3, 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-67

64. Tóth, Z., Henneberg, S. C., & Naudé, P. (2017), “Addressing the ‘Qualitative’ in fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis: The Generic Membership Evaluation Template”, Industrial Marketing Management, 63, 192–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.10.008

65. True, J. L., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2007), “Punctuated equilibrium theory: Explaining stability and change in American policymaking”, In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.

66. Verweij, S., Klijn, E.-H., Edelenbos, J., & Buuren, A. van. (2013), “What makes governance networks work? A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of 14 Dutch spatial planning projects”, Public Administration, 91(4), 1035–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12007

67. Vink, M. P., & Van Vliet, O. (2009), “Not Quite Crisp, Not Yet Fuzzy? Assessing the Potentials and Pitfalls of Multi-value QCA”, Field Methods, 21(3), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X09332633

68. Vinke-de Kruijf, J., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Knieper, C. (2018), “Wider learning outcomes of European climate change adaptation projects: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis”, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.09.004

69. Wagemann, C., & Schneider, C. Q. (2010), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis ( QCA ) and Fuzzy-Sets : Agenda for a Research Approach”, Comparative Sociology, 9, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729838

70. Warren, J., Wistow, J., & Bambra, C. (2013), “Applying Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to evaluate a public health policy initiative in the North East of England”, Policy and Society, 32(4), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.10.002

71. Williams, M., & Vogt, W. (2011), “The SAGE Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods”, London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268261

72. Yin, R. K. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Inc.

73. Yong, T., & Park, C. (2017), “A qualitative comparative analysis on factors affecting the deployment of electric vehicles”, Energy Procedia, 128, 497–503. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.066

1. ساعی، علی؛ افشار کبیری؛ محمدسالار کسرایی و حسین صادقی (1390)، «سرمایه اجتماعی و حکمرانی خوب: تحلیل تطبیقی فازی بین کشوری از سال 2000 تا 2008»، مسائل اجتماعی ایران (دانشگاه خوارزمی)، 2 (2)، ص63−94.

2. عباسی تقی دیزج، رسول (1398)، «تحلیل تطبیقی−کیفی عوامل مؤثر بر تولید علم در سطح کلان»، جامعه‌شناسی کاربردی (مجله پژوهشی علوم انسانی دانشگاه اصفهان)، 1(73)، ص105−122.

3. عباسی تقی دیزج، رسول و مسعود فراستخواه (1393)، «تحلیل فازی عوامل مؤثر بر توازن بین برابری آموزش عالی و توسعه اقتصادی در سطح کلان (یک رویکرد تطبیقی−کمی)»، پژوهش‌های جامعه‌شناسی معاصر، 3(5)، ص25−50.

4. عباسی، رسول و رضا همتی (1392). «تحلیل تطبیقی−کیفی تضاد سیاسی خشونت آمیز در سطح کلان»، فصلنامه جامعه‌شناسی کاربردی، 24(2)، ص 89−110.

5. Bandelow, N. C., Vogeler, C. S., Hornung, J., Kuhlmann, J., & Heidrich, S. (2019), “Learning as a Necessary but Not Sufficient Condition for Major Health Policy Change: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Combining ACF and MSF”, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1393920

6. Basurto, X., & Speer, J. (2010), “Structuring the Calibration of Qualitative Data as Sets for Qualitative Comparative Analysis ( QCA ) ”, https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1831606

7. Berg-Schlosser, D., & De Meur, G. (2009), “Comparative research design: case and variable selection. In Beno Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.)”, Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (pp. 19–32). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569

8. Berg-Schlosser, D., De Meur, G., Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. C. (2009), “Qualitative comparative analysis (qca) as an approach. In Benoît Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.)”, Applied Social Research Methods: Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (pp. 1–18). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569 NV - 51

9. Capano, G., Pritoni, A., & Vicentini, G. (n.d.), “Do policy instruments matter? Governments’ choice of policy mix and higher education performance in Western Europe”, Journal of Public Policy, 1–27. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X19000047

10. Caren, N., & Panofsky, A. (2005), “A Technique for Adding Temporality to Qualitative”, Sociological Methods & Research, 34(2), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124105277197

11. Cooper, B., & Glaesser, J. (2016), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis , Necessary Conditions , and Limited Diversity : Some Problematic Consequences of Schneider and Wagemann ’ s Enhanced Standard Analysis”, Field Methods, 28(3), 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X15598974

12. Cragun, D., Pal, T., Vadaparampil, S. T., Baldwin, J., Hampel, H., & DeBate, R. D. (2016), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Hybrid Method for Identifying Factors Associated with Program Effectiveness”, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(3), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815572023

13. Cronqvist, L., & Berg-Schlosser, D. (2009), “Multi-value qca (mvqca). In Benoît Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.)”, Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (pp. 69–86). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569 NV - 51

14. Davis, A., Javernick-Will, A., & Cook, S. M. (2019), “The use of qualitative comparative analysis to identify pathways to successful and failed sanitation systems”, Science of The Total Environment, 663, 507–517. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.291

15. De Block, D., & Vis, B. (2018), “Addressing the Challenges Related to Transforming Qualitative Into Quantitative Data in Qualitative Comparative Analysis”, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1558689818770061. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818770061

16. De Meur, G., Rihoux, B., & Yamasaki, S. (2009). “Addressing the critiques of qca. In Benoît Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (pp. 147–166). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569 NV - 51

17. Dekker, R., & Scholten, P. (2017), “Framing the Immigration Policy Agenda: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Media Effects on Dutch Immigration Policies”, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216688323

18. Fischer, M., & Maggetti, M. (2017), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis and the Study of Policy Processes”, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 19(4), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2016.1149281

19. Hill, L. G., Cooper, B. R., & Parker, L. A. (2019), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Mixed-Method Tool for Complex Implementation Questions”, The Journal of Primary Prevention, 40(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-019-00536-5

20. Hörisch, F. (2013), “Fiscal Policy in Hard Times: A Fuzzy-Set QCA of Fiscal Policy Reactions to the Financial Crisis”, Zeitschrift Für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 7(2), 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-013-0152-y

21. Ingrams, A. (2017), “The transparency performance puzzle : A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of policy failure in open government initiatives un co rre ct ed pr oo f v si un co rre ct pr oo”, Information Polity, (22), 25–39, https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-160014

22. Jordan, E., Gross, M. E., Javernick-Will, A. N., & Garvin, M. J. (2011), “Use and misuse of qualitative comparative analysis”, Construction Management and Economics, 29(11), 1159–1173, https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.640339

23. Kahwati, L., Jacobs, S., Kane, H., Lewis, M., Viswanathan, M., & Golin, C. E. (2016). “Using qualitative comparative analysis in a systematic review of a complex intervention”, Systematic Reviews, 5, 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0256-y

24. Kane, H., Lewis, M. A., Williams, P. A., & Kahwati, L. C. (2014), “Using qualitative comparative analysis to understand and quantify translation and implementation”, Translational Behavioral Medicine, 4(2), 201–208, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-014-0251-6

25. Kim, Y., & Verweij, S. (2016), “Two effective causal paths that explain the adoption of US state environmental justice policy”, Policy Sciences, 49(4), 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9249-x

26. Kingdon, J. W. (1984), Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, Boston: Little Brown.

27. Krook, M. L. (2010), “Women’s Representation in Parliament: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis”, Political Studies, 58(5), 886–908, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00833.x

28. Lee, S. S. (2013a), “Fuzzy-set method in comparative social policy: a critical introduction and review of the applications of the fuzzy-set method”, Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 1905–1922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9633-8

29. Lee, S. S. (2013b), “High non-standard employment rates in the Republic of Korea and Japan: Analyzing policy configurations with fuzzy-set/QCA”, Policy and Society, 32(4), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.10.005

30. Legewie, N. (2013), “An Introduction to Applied Data Analysis with Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) ”, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14(3), Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1961/3594

31. Maggetti, M. (2009), “The role of independent regulatory agencies in policy-making: a comparative analysis”, Journal of European Public Policy, 16(3), 450–470, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802662854

32. Maggetti, M., & Levi-Faur, D. (2013), “Dealing with Errors in QCA”, Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 198–204. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23563603

33. Marx, A. (2010), “Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA) and model specification: Benchmarks for future csQCA applications”, International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(2), 138–158, https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2010.4.2.138

34. Mello, P. A. (2013), “From Prospect to Practice : A Critical Review of Applications in Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis”, In 8th Pan-European Conference on International Relations. Warsaw, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2349513

35. Mill, J. S. (Ed.). (2011), “Of the Four Methods of Experimental Inquiry”, In A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence, and the Methods of Scientific Investigation (Vol. 1, pp. 450–479), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139149839.024

36. Pogrebinschi, T., & Ryan, M. (2018), “Moving beyond input legitimacy: When do democratic innovations affect policy making? ”, European Journal of Political Research, 57(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12219

37. Primc, K., Slabe-Erker, R., & Majcen, B. (2019), “Constructing energy poverty profiles for an effective energy policy”, Energy Policy, 128, 727–734. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.059

38. Pritoni, A. (2018), “Public Agendas and Policy Agendas in Three Western European Countries: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis”, Government and Opposition, 1–22. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/gov.2018.28

39. Ragin, C. C. (1987), “The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies”, University of California Press, Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pnx57

40. Ragin, C. C. (1994), “Introduction to qualitative comparative analysis”, In A. M. Hicks & T. Janoski (Eds.), The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State (pp. 299–319). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139174053.013

41. Ragin, C. C. (2008a), “Measurement Versus Calibration: A Set‐Theoretic Approach”, In J. M. Box-Steffensmeier, H. E. Brady, D. Collier, & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology (pp. 174–198). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0008

42. Ragin, C. C. (2008b), Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

43. Ragin, C. C. (2009), “Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsqca) ”, In Benoît Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (pp. 87–122). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569 NV - 51

44. Ragin, C. C., & Rubinson, C. (2009), “The distinctiveness of comparative research”, In T. L. & N. Robinson (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Comparative Politics (pp. 12–34). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857021083.n2

45. Ragin, C. C., & Sonnett, J. (2005), “Between Complexity and Parsimony: Limited Diversity, Counterfactual Cases, and Comparative Analysis BT - Vergleichen in der Politikwissenschaft”, In S. Kropp & M. Minkenberg (Eds.) (pp. 180–197). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80441-9_9

46. Ragin, C. C., Patros, T., Strand, S. I., & Rubinson, C. (2017). USER’S GUIDE TO Fuzzy-Set / Qualitative Comparative Analysis. California, Irvine.

47. Rihoux, Benoît, & De Meur, G. (2009), “Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csqca) ”, In Benoît Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (pp. 33–68). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569 NV - 51

48. Rihoux, Benoît, & Grimm, H. (2006), “Introduction. In Benoît Rihoux & H. Grimm (Eds.), Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis Beyond the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28829-5

49. Rihoux, Benoît, Álamos-Concha, P., Bol, D., Marx, A., & Rezsöhazy, I. (2013), “From Niche to Mainstream Method? A Comprehensive Mapping of QCA Applications”, in Journal Articles from 1984 to 2011. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 175–184. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23563600

50. Rihoux, Benoît, Rezsöhazy, I., & Bol, D. (2011), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) in Public Policy Analysis: an Extensive Review”, German Policy Studies, 7(3), 9–82.

51. Rihoux, Benoît. (2008), “Case‐Oriented Configura‐Tional Research: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (Qca), Fuzzy Sets, and Related Techniques”, In J. M. Box-Steffensmeier, H. E. Brady, D. Collier, & B. Rihoux (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology (pp. 722–736). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0031

52. Roig-Tierno, N., Gonzalez-Cruz, T. F., & Llopis-Martinez, J. (2017), “An overview of qualitative comparative analysis: A bibliometric analysis”, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.12.002

53. Sabatier, P. A. (1988), “An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein”, Policy Sciences, 21(2/3), 129–168. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4532139

54. Schneider, C. Q. (2019), “Two-step QCA revisited: the necessity of context conditions”, Quality & Quantity, 53(3), 1109–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0805-7

55. Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2006), “Reducing complexity in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Remote and proximate factors and the consolidation of democracy”, European Journal of Political Research, 45(5), 751–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00635.x

56. Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2010), “Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets”, Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 397–418. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729793

57. Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012), “Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Strategies for Social Inquiry”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139004244

58. Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2013), “Doing Justice to Logical Remainders in QCA: Moving Beyond the Standard Analysis”, Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 211–220. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23563605

59. Sehring, J., & Korhonen, K. (2013), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis ( QCA ): An application to compare national Qualitative Comparative Analysis ( QCA ) An application to compare national REDD + policy processes (No. Working Paper 121) ”, Indonesia, Bogor. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/004278

60. Smith, K. B., & Larimer, C. (2017), The Public Policy Theory Primer, New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494352

61. Stokke, O. S. (2004),. “Boolean Analysis, Mechanisms, and the Study of Regime Effectiveness BT - Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies”, In A. Underdal & O. R. Young (Eds.) (pp. 87–119). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2208-1_5

62. Thomann, E. (2019), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis ( QCA ) as a tool for street-level bureaucracy. In P. Hupe (Ed.)”, Research Handbook on Street-Level Bureaucracy (pp. 370–391). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786437631.00035

63. Thomas, J., O’Mara-Eves, A., & Brunton, G. (2014), “Using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in systematic reviews of complex interventions: a worked example”, Systematic Reviews, 3, 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-67

64. Tóth, Z., Henneberg, S. C., & Naudé, P. (2017), “Addressing the ‘Qualitative’ in fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis: The Generic Membership Evaluation Template”, Industrial Marketing Management, 63, 192–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.10.008

65. True, J. L., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2007), “Punctuated equilibrium theory: Explaining stability and change in American policymaking”, In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.

66. Verweij, S., Klijn, E.-H., Edelenbos, J., & Buuren, A. van. (2013), “What makes governance networks work? A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of 14 Dutch spatial planning projects”, Public Administration, 91(4), 1035–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12007

67. Vink, M. P., & Van Vliet, O. (2009), “Not Quite Crisp, Not Yet Fuzzy? Assessing the Potentials and Pitfalls of Multi-value QCA”, Field Methods, 21(3), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X09332633

68. Vinke-de Kruijf, J., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Knieper, C. (2018), “Wider learning outcomes of European climate change adaptation projects: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis”, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.09.004

69. Wagemann, C., & Schneider, C. Q. (2010), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis ( QCA ) and Fuzzy-Sets : Agenda for a Research Approach”, Comparative Sociology, 9, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729838

70. Warren, J., Wistow, J., & Bambra, C. (2013), “Applying Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to evaluate a public health policy initiative in the North East of England”, Policy and Society, 32(4), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.10.002

71. Williams, M., & Vogt, W. (2011), “The SAGE Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods”, London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268261

72. Yin, R. K. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Inc.

73. Yong, T., & Park, C. (2017), “A qualitative comparative analysis on factors affecting the deployment of electric vehicles”, Energy Procedia, 128, 497–503. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.066