روش‌شناسی پژوهش مروری و نقش آن در تولید دانش: توسعه یک گونه‌شناسی

,1-م.، و فتاحی، ر. (۱۳۸۴). راهنمای نگارش مرور نوشتارها و پیشینه پژوهش در حوزه های علوم انسانی و اجتماعی. تهران: کتابدار.

2-رضائیان، م. (1392). مروری بر انواع مطالعات مروری در حوزه سلامت. مجله تحقیقات نظام سلامت، 9(11)، 1149-1157.

3-یارمحمدیان، م.، محمدی, ع.، و موحدی، ف. (1390). استانداردهایی برای تدوین مقالات مروری در نظام سلامت. مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت، 8(8), 1226-1234.

4-American Psychological Association. (2013). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

5-Anderson, S., Allen, P., Peckham, S., & Goodwin, N. (2008). Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Health Research Policy and Systems, 6(1), 7.

6-Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.

7-Azar, A. S., & Hashim, A. (2014). Towards an Analysis of Review Article in Applied Linguistics: Its Classes, Purposes and Characteristics. English Language Teaching, 7, 76-88.

8-Azar, A. S., & Hashim, A. (2014). Towards an Analysis of Review Article in Applied Linguistics: Its Classes, Purposes and Characteristics. English Language Teaching, 7, 76-88.

9-Babbie, E. (2013). Earl Babbie identifies three purposes of social-science research: exploratory, descriptive and explanatory. 2007. The Practice of Social Research. 11th edition. Belmont CA: Thompson - Wadsworth. pp. 87-89. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.

10-Baumeister, R., & Leary, M. (1997). Writing Narrative Literature Reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 311-320.

11-Bern, D. (1995). Writing a Review Article for Psychological Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 118(2), 172-177.

12-Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B., ..., & Khalil, M. (2007). Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. The Journal of Systems and Software, 80, 571–583.

13-Cooper, H. (1988). Organizing Knowledge Syntheses: A Taxonomy of Literature Reviews. Knowledge in Society, 1(1), 104–126.

14-Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1), 38-43.

15-Davis, K., Drey, N., & Gould, D. (2009). What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46, 1386–1400.

16-Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., ..., & Sutton, A. (2005). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10, 45–53.

17-Dixon-Woods, M., Cavers, D., ..., & Agarwal, S. (2006). Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6(1), 35.

18-Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. (2008). DOING A LITERATURE REVIEW. In M. Easterby-Smith, R. Thorpe, & P. Jackson, Management Research (pp. 29-53). SAGE.

19-Grant, M., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 91–108.

20-Green, B., Johnson, C., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. JOURNAL OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE, 5(3), 101-117.

21-Greenhalgh, T. (1997). How to read a paper; Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta­analyses). British Medical Journal, 315, 672-675.

22-Higgins, J., & Green, S. (2008). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

23-Hutton, B., Salanti, G., Caldwell, D., ..., & Moher, D. (2015). The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations. Annals of Internal Medicine, 162(11), 777-484.

24-JESSON, J., & LACEY, F. (2006). How to do (or not to do) a critical literature review. Pharmacy Education, 6(2), 139–148.

25-King, W., & He, J. (2005). Understanding the Role and Methods of Meta- Analysis in IS Research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 665-686.

26-Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Computer Science. Keele: Keele University.

27-Liberati, A., Altman, D., ..., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), 1-28.

28-Mayer, P. (2009). Guidelines for writing a Review Article. Retrieved MAY 15, 2017, from Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center: http://www.plantscience.ethz.ch/education/Masters/courses/Scientific_Writing

29-Mays, N., Pope, C., & Popay, J. (2005). Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10, 6–20.

30-Mertens, D. (2014). Literature Review and Focusing the Research. In D. Mertens, Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology (4 ed., p. 536). SAGE.

31-Mertens, D. (2014). Literature Review and Focusing the Research. In D. Mertens, Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology (4 ed., p. 536). SAGE.

32-Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D., & Group, T. P. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8, 336-341.

33-Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2010). A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information, 10(26). Retrieved jul 26, 2018, from http://sprouts.aisnet.org/10-26

34-Pare, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & Management, 52, 183–199.

35-Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005). Realist review – a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10, 21–34.

36-Pieper, D., Buechter, R., Jerinic, P., & Eikermann, M. (2012). Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65, 1267-1273.

37-Randolph, J. (2009). A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(13), 1-13.

38-Rumrill, P., Fitzgerald, S., & Merchant, W. (2010). Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature. Work (Reading, Mass.), 35(3), 399–404.

39-Smith, V., Devane, D., Begley, C., & Clarke, M. (2011). Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), 15.

40-The Methods Coordinating Group of the Campbell Col. (2016). Methodological expectations of Campbell Collaboration intervention reviews: Conduct standards and Reporting standards. The Campbell Collaboration.

41-Torraco, R. (2005). Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356-367.

42-Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management , 14, 207-222.

43-Webster, J., & Watson, R. (2002). Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii-xxiii.

44-Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., & Pawson, R. (2010). Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances. BMC Medical Education, 10(12), 1.